Preventive Detention
Detention order
Judicial review Quashed by the High Court on ground that the order of remand along with the forwarding letter was not sent to the detaining authority, and/or an additional affidavit was not filed However, order of remand was placed by the sponsoring authority before the detaining authority when the detention order was passed, undisputed Held, in such circumstances High Court's view that there should have been a forwarding letter or an additional affidavit was clearly without basis Impugned order set aside, (2006) 7 SCC 540-A
Preventive Detention
Detention order
Delay in execution of the order Supreme Court setting aside High Court's order of quashing the detention order Whether respondent detenu in such circumstances could be appropriately directed to surrender for serving remaining period of detention in view of passage of time Held, passage of time in all cases cannot be a ground not to send the detenu to serve remainder of the period of detention It all depends on the facts of the act and the continuance or otherwise of the effect of the objectionable acts State directed to consider within a period of two months whether there still existed a proximate temporal nexus between the period of detention indicated in the detention order and the date when the detenu was required to be detained pursuant to Supreme Court's order, (2006) 7 SCC 540-B
|